PDA

View Full Version : Lowering Drinking Age


snugsnug
08-16-2007, 08:13 AM
Lowering Drinking Age to 18 Gets Consideration
August 15, 2007


Several states, including Florida, Wisconsin, Vermont and Missouri, have studied the idea of lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, as some experts are suggesting, MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20249460/) reported Aug. 14.
The National Youth Rights Association has launched a petition drive to lower the drinking age, and some Missouri advocates are organizing a ballot initiative. John McCardell, former president of Middlebury College in Vermont, has become the most visible advocate for the change.
“The law was changed in 1984, and the law had a very specific purpose, and that was to prohibit drinking among those under the age of 21,” McCardell said. “The only way to measure the success of that law is to ask ourselves whether, 23 years later, those under 21 are not drinking.” “The evidence is very clear,” McCardell said. “It has had no effect.”
Backers believe the rise of binge drinking among adolescents and college students can be directly traced to raising the drinking age to 21. “Just like during national Prohibition, the law has pushed and forced underage drinking and youthful drinking underground, where we have no control over it," said David J. Hanson, an alcohol policy expert at the State University of New York-Potsdam.
Opposition to the proposal remains strong, however. “Why would we repeal or weaken laws that save lives? It doesn’t make sense," said Mark Rosenker, chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. The age-21 laws adopted by all 50 states -- under threat by Congress of losing their federal highway funds -- have been credited with lowering the rate of drunk-driving fatalities. But critics also question the studies used to link the age-21 law and lower alcohol-related traffic fatalities.
McCardell's group, Choose Responsibility, would like to see the drinking age lowered to 18 but also wants "drinking licenses" issued to those ages 18 to 21. McCardell also wants youths to receive more education on responsible alcohol consumption.
However, 77 percent of Americans recently surveyed by Gallup said they opposed lowering the drinking age.

clean42day
08-16-2007, 12:18 PM
Opposition to the proposal remains strong, however. “Why would we repeal or weaken laws that save lives? It doesn’t make sense," said Mark Rosenker, chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. The age-21 laws adopted by all 50 states -- under threat by Congress of losing their federal highway funds -- have been credited with lowering the rate of drunk-driving fatalities. But critics also question the studies used to link the age-21 law and lower alcohol-related traffic fatalities.
McCardell's group, Choose Responsibility, would like to see the drinking age lowered to 18 but also wants "drinking licenses" issued to those ages 18 to 21. McCardell also wants youths to receive more education on responsible alcohol consumption.
However, 77 percent of Americans recently surveyed by Gallup said they opposed lowering the drinking age.

Ok so how about they make the alcohol manufacturers responsible for the extra budget money needed to clean up alcohol related fatalaties, pay for funerals, make restitution to families, make them liable for law suits involving alcohol related accidents.....and tax their profits for all the extra money it will take to incarcerate teenagers at 18.

supply and demand does not change until the it costs the supplier more to manufacture the product than the profit margin dictates. They can pass as many laws as they want to and nothing will change until it hits the manufacturers in the pocket book and it is no longer profitable to sell the product. as long as this country continues to run on the person blame approach - the sytem will never take responsibility for their part. acohol is big money just like ciggarrettes. as long as their is money in it....they will claim a right to free enterprise - even at the expense of lives.

JMHO

Gail

Troll
08-19-2007, 09:55 AM
Some organizations need to attend meetings and victims panels as a whole......When I heard the headline on tv...I thought for a second that they were finally going to make it universal that one had to be 21 to drink in our nation. I have often thought that it would be a good first step in raising the age of drinking beyond the 21 to 24. Well, nice thought. It also could be driven by our dear friends in the auto insurance game so that they can rationally raise rates on people between 18 and 21. Some states manage the liquer business themselves and sell to the public. For them, it would increase sales and revenue to the state to lower the age.......and of course, there might even be lobbying by the funeral home operators of America...after all, do you know about their lobbying efforts on reducing the penalties for drunk driving? <=== not the truth, but a hell of a thought ... Please, send all complaints from sober alcoholic undertakers to my email: ireallydidn'tmeanit@justforthesakeofarguement.com
:mrgreen: